Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!bagate!cbmvax!jesup From: jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer Subject: Re: HELP with Independant Children Processes Message-ID: <18750@cbmvax.commodore.com> Date: 9 Feb 91 00:33:38 GMT References: <1991Feb4.171549.28531@nntp-server.caltech.edu> <18606@cbmvax.commodore.com> Reply-To: jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup) Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA Lines: 19 In article Jay@deepthot.UUCP (Jay Denebeim) writes: >Arrggg... Andy, take a look at the autodocs then, I read 'em >before making my post. They sound like its the other way >In exec 'requires RUN to be in C:' made me think it was async, >System returns the return code, which made me think it was >sync... I've modified the autodocs to make it more clear. >By the way, you can't have return code and async can you? Nope. -- Randell Jesup, Keeper of AmigaDos, Commodore Engineering. {uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!jesup, jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com BIX: rjesup The compiler runs Like a swift-flowing river I wait in silence. (From "The Zen of Programming") ;-)