Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!wookumz.ai.mit.edu!jailbait From: jailbait@wookumz.ai.mit.edu (Jailbait) Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp Subject: Backups on various HP systems Summary: Advice request for DAT B'ups on various machines Keywords: newsgroups Message-ID: <13234@life.ai.mit.edu> Date: 7 Feb 91 17:24:46 GMT References: Sender: news@ai.mit.edu Reply-To: jailbait@ai.mit.edu Followup-To: comp.sys.hp Organization: JB Distribution Uninc. Lines: 30 X-Comment-About-Reply-To-Field: No, really, it does work. Resend if bounce. I'm currently admining a number of HPs, mainly 9000/835's, with responsibilities including some 9000/3xx and soon a HP/Sequoia 9000/1240. Most of these machines have DAT/DDS drives on them and we perform backups nightly (either automated or started at the end of the day and left to run. The problem is that our systems are expanding in disk size, and are starting to reach/overflow the 1.3 Gigabyte DAT capacity. As we do it now, we're simply using CPIO. We're willing to use anything else that may work well, but the quest is for something that can be run automatically in the background (via CRON) and simply call for another tape if it needs it. The current situation is such that for a backup that will more than fill a tape, the backup must be run in the foreground and the /dev/icename must be typed in when another tape is needed. This is less than optimal when you have an 'operations' group monitoring the machines. I know that many tape drives out ther can sense when a tape has been removed and a new one put in, thus meaning that at the end of a tape, simply ejecting the full tape and inserting the empty tape will enable the BU to continue. (At least, I think I know this) Is there any package out there for the HP DDS drive (both HP-IB and SCSI are in use) that can do similar? Or, failing that, is there something that can run in the background and request input from the foreground when it needs a new tape? (Yeah, I know what the odds are for that.) Is there any way I could've expressed this better? Probably, so if you have any questions, feel free to ask (Mail or post.). Many thanks, JB