Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!news.cs.indiana.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!iboga!berger From: berger@iboga (Mike Berger) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: panasonic vs multisync 3d Message-ID: <1991Feb9.212129.11699@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: 9 Feb 91 21:21:29 GMT References: <1991Feb7.222709.17328@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <10940@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Sender: news@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News) Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Lines: 21 c164-al@juliet.uucp (Joon Song) writes: >I've seen the Panasonic 1381 advertised locally for $395. If the ViewPerfect >monitor costs $100 less than the Panasonic, are you saying that I should be >able to buy a ViewPerfect monitor for $295. >The major difference between the NEC 3D and the Panasonic 1381 is the range >of horizontal frequencies that they can handle. The NEC 3D is a true >multisync monitor which can handle frequencies between 15kHz and 38kHz. >The Panasonic 1381 is what some people call a dualsync. Its frequency range >is limited, from 31kHz to 38kHz. *---- I think we're talking about different items. This is the first posting in which I've seen a specific model number. The Panasync monitor I refer to is virtually identical to the NEC 3D, and the Matsushita equivalent is the ViewPerfect 3. The prices I've seen are higher than you quoted. -- Mike Berger Department of Statistics, University of Illinois AT&TNET 217-244-6067 Internet berger@atropa.stat.uiuc.edu