Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jarthur!nntp-server.caltech.edu!woody From: woody@nntp-server.caltech.edu (William Edward Woody) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Homemade checks...? Message-ID: <1991Feb10.083107.9169@nntp-server.caltech.edu> Date: 10 Feb 91 08:31:07 GMT References: <1CE00001.qhffxx@tbomb.ice.com> Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Lines: 39 In article <1CE00001.qhffxx@tbomb.ice.com> time@ice.com writes: > >In article <360@alchemy.UUCP>, hzink@alchemy.UUCP (Harry K. Zink) writes: >> I have heard, though, that these numbers need to be in magnetic ink, which >> precious few laserwriters handle. My question now concerns if the check >> *needs* this magnetic ink in order to be legally useable. I do not see why it > >It is absolutely true that most banks require magnetic ink on the >checks that they process. On the other hand, banks are required to >cash all checks written against their bank. I'm sorry for following up here with this, however... I believe the purpose of the magnetic ink at the bottom of your check is to simplify the bank's job of processing the large volume of checks most banks must process in a given day. The magnetic ink does not make the check a legal document, nor do all checks get successfully read in by the processing automation. 'Nuf said. Anyways, if you all are going to go out there and start printing your own checks, remind me never to send you a check on my account for payment to you, as it's just too easy nowadays for anyone with a laserprinter and a little spare time (especially if they've done most of the work making their own checks) to simply copy my account number to the bottom of their check. And as only a small fraction of the checks processed ever have the signature verified against the signature on file, I'd be a bit worried about the possibilites of forgery. Flames to /dev/null. -- Bill -- William Edward Woody | Disclamer: USNAIL P.O.Box 50986; Pasadena, CA 91115 | EMAIL woody@tybalt.caltech.edu | The useful stuff in this message ICBM 34 08' 44''N x 118 08' 41''W | was only line noise.