Path: utzoo!attcan!telly!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!world!BPorter
From: BPorter@world.std.com (Barry M Porter)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: IIsi vs IIci
Message-ID: <1991Feb6.052040.198@world.std.com>
Date: 6 Feb 91 05:20:40 GMT
References: <91036.203236GFX@psuvm.psu.edu>
Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die
Lines: 11

The IIci, in my opinion, is a far better machine.  It has the math 
co-processor built in, it can handle the power requirements of almost any 
add-on board available, it is not clowed down by color built into the ROMS.  
(clowed=slowed).
  It is FAR more expensive though, and you don't get that neat little 
microphone that comes on the SI. The CI is more expandable at this time and 
faster.
{   I hear on the street that the Mac LC is a better bargain for the price, if 
you insist on getting one of the new machines.
    Hokay?     Just my 2 cents.  IleneH on AOL, Message Manager of BCS-Mac 
TBBS (617-6256747), piggy backing on Barry's account....