Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!src.honeywell.com!msi.umn.edu!cs.umn.edu!kksys!wd0gol!newave!john From: john@newave.UUCP (John A. Weeks III) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc Subject: Re: Us Mac Yoosers R Stoopid Keywords: Mac Bashing Message-ID: <638@newave.UUCP> Date: 8 Feb 91 04:05:31 GMT References: <7285@tekgen.BV.TEK.COM> Reply-To: john@newave.mn.org (John A. Weeks III) Organization: NeWave Communications Ltd, Eden Prairie, MN Lines: 28 In article <7285@tekgen.BV.TEK.COM> brucec@tekgen.BV.TEK.COM (Bruce Cheney) writes: > If that doesn't get your blood running, Mac users, how about this. Students > who wrote on IBMs and clones made about four spelling errors per paper, > while the Mac user rang up and average of not 4, not 8, not 12, but 15 > spelling errors on each assignment. Don't either of these machines have spelling checkers? Me thinks a computer hater, or worse yet, a PC user that hasn't yet figured out the alt-shift-control-fkey-cryptic command that runs the spelling checker. > And that raises the key question. When every DOS-PC runs just like a > Macintosh, and every Mac looks like an IBM-PC, what will happen to those > freshman papers? Will the Macintosh users bring their grades up, or will > the DOS types sink to the error-prone level of their Mac-owning classmates. I bet the papers will be covered with frost because the PC and Mac will not look like each other until hell freezes over. Windows and icons do not make a Macintosh. A machine running DOS can never hope to be anything more that a Dosintosh (actually, that name is more than 8 characters, so I guess it would have to be a DOSINTOS.H). -john- -- =============================================================================== John A. Weeks III (612) 942-6969 john@newave.mn.org NeWave Communications ...uunet!rosevax!tcnet!wd0gol!newave!john ===============================================================================