Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!skink.cis.ohio-state.edu!macgyver From: macgyver@skink.cis.ohio-state.edu (wilson m liaw) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: SuperCard VS. ThinkPascal/TCL Message-ID: <88084@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> Date: 7 Feb 91 03:42:56 GMT References: <1647.27B01608@stjhmc.fidonet.org> Sender: news@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Reply-To: wilson m liaw Organization: Ohio State University Computer and Information Science Lines: 18 In article <1647.27B01608@stjhmc.fidonet.org> Lawson.English@p88.f15.n300.z1.fidonet.org (Lawson English) writes: >G. Marzot writes in a message to All >My sole question: How large is the stand-alone code for the SuperCard application >vs the TCL one? If they are comparable, then go with the easiest to implement/maintain. >If SuperCard is larger (it would be hard to imagine the TCL app being larger), >then decide just how large is too large. > I believe Supercard adds in around 600k worth of code in stand alone application, TCL is around 100k I think... Mac -- Wilson MacGyver | In every heart, there is a time machine Internet:macgyver@cis.ohio-state.edu | if you believe in your memeory. Trace =====================================| every place you've been, you know what Disclaimer:All opinions are mine only| it means. -Encouragement from Martika