Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!spool2.mu.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!pasteur!euler.Berkeley.EDU!johnim
From: johnim@euler.Berkeley.EDU (John Im)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: IIcx ROM Question
Summary: No more inits, please!
Message-ID: <10178@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 14 Jan 91 14:58:14 GMT
References: <41599@nigel.ee.udel.edu>
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: johnim@euler.Berkeley.EDU (John Im)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 18

In article <41599@nigel.ee.udel.edu> johnston@oscar.ccm.udel.edu writes:
>
>Naively, it would seem that whatever is lacking could be taken care
>off by an init.  Isn't this what 32-Bit QuickDraw does for the Mac II
>and the IIx?  On a 20-meg IIcx it seems like very few people would
>opt to PAY for a 32-bit clean ROM if an init could patch the nasty
>bits ...
>

Oh no, not another init!

If the ROM upgrade doesn't cost too much (which I hope Apple will allow),
I'd rather go that route.  I've got too many inits as it is :-)

-John

johnim@euler.berkeley.edu
(415) 649-7864