Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsl!coco
From: coco@cbnewsl.att.com (felix.a.lugo)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: NeXT keyboards
Message-ID: <1991Feb6.041530.21907@cbnewsl.att.com>
Date: 6 Feb 91 04:15:30 GMT
References: <5111@media-lab.MEDIA.MIT.EDU> <_u8G$b1f@cs.psu.edu> <1046@kaos.MATH.UCLA.EDU>
Sender: coco@ihlpb.att.com
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 31

In article <1046@kaos.MATH.UCLA.EDU> barry@pico.math.ucla.edu (Barry Merriman) writes:
| melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes:
| 
| >Don't the programmers
| >at NeXT find the new keyboards an inconvenience?
| 
| No, they're all using NeXTStep 2.1 which supports telepathic input :-)
| 

	Probably they're still using the original keyboards and haven't even
	seen the new versions, or, they were probably as surprised as you and
	I are after they saw them.  If I were NeXT, I would not go out and
	replace developer's keyboards every time a new design comes along.

	(Maybe NeXT is now replacing developer's keyboard for the ones
	customers turn in.  They get the new versions, we get the good ones.)
	 8^)

/*
** ============================================================================
**
**  Felix A. Lugo					AT&T Bell Laboratories
**
**	E-Mail:
**	(708) 713-4374	coco@ihlpb.att.com	att!ihlpb!coco
**
**	NeXT-Mail:
**	(708) 515-0668	coco@alien.att.com	alien.att.com!bootsie!coco
**
** ============================================================================
*/