Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!linus!agate!shelby!portia.stanford.edu!jessica.stanford.edu!kocks From: kocks@jessica.stanford.edu (Peter Kocks) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: Should I get a NeXT? Keywords: next Message-ID: <1991Feb6.032155.26114@portia.Stanford.EDU> Date: 6 Feb 91 03:21:55 GMT References: <87442@unix.cis.pitt.edu> <15875@milton.u.washington.edu> <10509@cica.cica.indiana.edu> <15887@milton.u.washington.edu> Sender: news@portia.Stanford.EDU (Mr News) Reply-To: kocks@jessica.stanford.edu (Peter Kocks) Distribution: usa Organization: Networking/Communications Lines: 38 Several points. 1) All the software that most people use is already on the NeXT and it is typically the most advanced version. WordProc. Frame and WordPerfect Spreadsheet Lotus Database Ingres and others Graphics Abobe Mail System stuff Graphic Debugger Onyx C++ emacs etc 2) Compatability With Wordperfect and Lotus and the IBM disk drive your golden for most of what you would want to do. 3) Will NeXT survive? Well, most kids (<16) use Macs today. In 10 years when they are in college, they probably will not tolerate DOS, unix, etc unless it is made much easier and more effective. NeXT (like many others) has a chance to get this market. NeXT has enough money and enough of a base (now with the new machine) to last long enough for this market to arrive. 4) What made the Mac was PageMaker (ie DeskTop Publishing) The NeXT is by far the best env. for Mathematica. I'm betting Mathematica will make it ***very*** big over the next 20 years. NeXT, if nothing else, could ride on the coat-tails. pkocks%chemistry.stanford.edu@relay.cs.net