Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!aplcomm!capd.jhuapl.edu!waltrip From: waltrip@capd.jhuapl.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: Novel Software Distribution Ideas Message-ID: <1991Feb6.103221.1@capd.jhuapl.edu> Date: 6 Feb 91 15:32:21 GMT References: <8847@hub.ucsb.edu> <1991Feb5.084512.26648@Neon.Stanford.EDU> <1045@kaos.MATH.UCLA.EDU> <1991Feb6.080837.26500@evax.arl.utexas.edu> Sender: news@aplcomm.JHUAPL.EDU Organization: CAPVAX, JHU/APL Lines: 39 In article <1991Feb6.080837.26500@evax.arl.utexas.edu>, herring@evax.arl.utexas.edu (Erick Herring) writes: [...lots of stuff deleted...] > > Most of the companies writing software for the NeXT have no such > safety net, and rely on the integrity of NeXT users and administrators > to protect their (sometimes tenuous) hold on survival. Be steadfast > in protecting their interests, they are also your own. > This is precisely why I believe it is in NeXT's strongest possible interests to provide a means (if possible) by which software vendors may control the licensing of products by specific machine. I don't suppose there is any foolproof mechanism for doing this but if NeXT could pull it off, they'd not only have ease of developing applications going for them, they'd have protection against piracy and flexibility of pricing. That's most of a developer's dream (the rest of the dream being a huge, captive market:^) The difficulty of developing software is one of the major factors in software price inflation. NeXT has addressed that perhaps better than any other computer vendor (that I know of). But another one of the major factors (in some cases, more of a factor than cost of development) is software piracy. So far, NeXT has not addressed this. Neither have they addressed what is certainly another major factor which Barry Merriman identified at the start of this thread: the inability to fine tune pricing in accordance with usage. His metering proposal addressed this cleverly. None of this is a criticism of NeXT--merely suggestions for attracting those developers and applications we all want (hopefully, at pricing we can afford). [...more stuff deleted...] c.f.waltrip Internet: Opinions expressed are my own.