Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!gatech!ncsuvx!news From: henkel%nepjt@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu (Chuck Henkel) Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix Subject: Paging space on RS/6000 Message-ID: Date: 9 Feb 91 21:25:31 GMT Sender: news@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu (USENET News System) Reply-To: henkel@nepjt.ncsu.edu (Chuck Henkel) Organization: North Carolina State University, Raleigh Lines: 19 Context: IBM RS/6000 320 @ release 3002 Is there any performance advantage in having a given amount of paging space split across two disks? We just bought an additional third party disk and need to increase paging space. This disk is probably a bit slower than the IBM disk, but I suppose I could specify an optimum location on the disk for the extra paging space. (Incidentally, where is this optimum location on a disk?). Both disks belong to the same physical volume. -- | Chuck Henkel | There are currently 111 operating | | Department of Nuclear Engineering | nuclear power plants in the US, | | N.C. State University | generating nearly 100,000 Megawatts | | henkel%nepjt@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu | of electricity. |