Xref: utzoo comp.unix.sysv386:4616 comp.unix.xenix.sco:1614
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!fub!geminix.in-berlin.de!gemini
From: gemini@geminix.in-berlin.de (Uwe Doering)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386,comp.unix.xenix.sco
Subject: Re: FAS 2.08 async driver, part 1/4
Keywords: UNIX async serial driver
Message-ID: <22WNO4D@geminix.in-berlin.de>
Date: 6 Feb 91 10:12:43 GMT
References: <60TNCCE@geminix.in-berlin.de> <1991Feb5.180523.1366@robobar.co.uk>
Organization: Private UNIX Site
Lines: 29

ronald@robobar.co.uk (Ronald S H Khoo) writes:

>gemini@geminix.in-berlin.de (Uwe Doering) writes:
>
>XENIX: The installation procedure for Xenix is completely different
>> X       from the other UNIX flavors.
>> X
>> X       In file `fas.h' you need to uncomment the `NEED_PUT_GETCHAR'
>> X       define before you compile the sources.
>
>This is apparently untrue if update UFM (and probably UFJ) is installed
>(which causes the kernel version to go up to 2.3.3) since sio{get,put}char
>are in ../io/vpixio.a and will collide with FAS's sio{get,put}char if
>you define the NEED_PUT_GETCHAR symbol.  No, I haven't got VPIX,
>but xenix 2.3.3 contains bits of vpix support.  I did define HAVE_VPIX
>in fas.h though.

OK, I changed this to:

       In file `fas.h' you may need to uncomment the `NEED_PUT_GETCHAR'
       define before you compile the sources.

So it's up to the user to figure out whether he needs to do this.

      Uwe
-- 
Uwe Doering  |  INET : gemini@geminix.in-berlin.de
Berlin       |----------------------------------------------------------------
Germany      |  UUCP : ...!unido!fub!geminix.in-berlin.de!gemini