Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen From: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: Dell SVR4 on non-Dell hardware? Keywords: not DELL's opinions, but observations.. Message-ID: <3109@sixhub.UUCP> Date: 10 Feb 91 16:38:37 GMT References: <70234@microsoft.UUCP> <14656@uudell.dell.com> <3085@sixhub.UUCP> <290@mondy.UUCP> Reply-To: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen) Organization: *IX Public Access UNIX, Schenectady NY Lines: 28 In article <290@mondy.UUCP> mdm%mondy@ralph.lafayette.la.us writes: | I purchased a Paradise Vga Professional before Dell started selling that | card or selling unix. I bought it because it was 100% HARDWARE compatible | with the IBM. Since it works, I'd IMAGINE that any other 100% hardware | compatible would work - at least at standard resolutions. I ripped the code out of fractint to put a standard IBM VGA (and all the goof CGA clones I ever tried) into 800x600 mode, and I E-mailed it to Dell V.4 development. I suggested that it would be a great thing to put in their X server. I guess they're not doing that (although I expect a new X server, possibly two) out of Dell by the end of the month. The comment was made that interlaced mode is not "visually acceptable" for X. I am really unhappy with any vendor who tells me that something wouldn't be acceptable to customers, when other programs use the feature and are accepted. I have been assurred that the Rowell server will be out, an enhanced version of the current server is also being developed, and that the AT&T X and NeWS server will come out eventually. Note that Dell decided to go with X11R4 and give up NeWS, rather than stay with X11R3, and I think that's a reasonable decision. -- bill davidsen - davidsen@sixhub.uucp (uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen) sysop *IX BBS and Public Access UNIX moderator of comp.binaries.ibm.pc and 80386 mailing list "Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me