Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!hybrid!scifi!bywater!uunet!tdatirv!sarima
From: sarima@tdatirv.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: rms says...
Message-ID: <124@tdatirv.UUCP>
Date: 2 Feb 91 18:18:57 GMT
References: <21327@yunexus.YorkU.CA> <100920286@hpcvlx.cv.hp.com>
Reply-To: sarima@tdatirv.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Organization: Teradata Corp., Irvine
Lines: 16

In article <100920286@hpcvlx.cv.hp.com> ben@hpcvlx.cv.hp.com (Benjamin Ellsworth) writes:
>  The vast (and I mean VAST) majority of users
>don't want the source to X windows.  They want it to run to the spec
>and run fast.  As the available implementations become less and less
>buggy and faster and faster, the demand for source code--small to begin
>with--just diminishes further.

Quite true!  The only reason I am bothering with the MIT code is the #*!*$
buggy OpenwWindow 2.0(Beta) on Sun39\86i workstations!  (That and the fact
that the libraries in the Beta version are release "3.5" rather than fully
release 4).

[OpenWindows 2.0(Beta) will not even run Framemaker!!!]
-- 
---------------
uunet!tdatirv!sarima				(Stanley Friesen)