Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!relay.nswc.navy.mil!oasys!mimsy!mojo!SYSMGR@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU From: sysmgr@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU (Doug Mohney) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: The killer business application Message-ID: <00944432.06FD6360@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU> Date: 15 Feb 91 14:43:40 GMT References: <29920@usc> <0094412A.15FE5B40@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU> <1991Feb11.221951.4758@berlioz.nsc.com> <009441DD.664D58E0@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU>,<7458@uceng.UC.EDU> Sender: news@eng.umd.edu (C-News) Reply-To: sysmgr@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU (Doug Mohney) Organization: The U. of MD, CP, CAD lab Lines: 35 In article <7458@uceng.UC.EDU>, dmocsny@minerva.che.uc.edu (Daniel Mocsny) writes: >Here is what makes the UNIX/RISC workstation usable: the person who >knows how to run the damned thing. Every UNIX box I have used so far >refuses to do any work until it has satisfied itself that somebody >has devoted themself full-time to its care and feeding. The UNIX >box doesn't give away power freely; the power comes at the >cost of breathtaking complexity. The only way to get on top of that >complexity today is to plow through hundreds of pounds of paper >documentation, a task that takes most mere mortals a few human-years. Well, I beg to differ here. I know hundreds (literally) of people who know the scantest thing about DOS, but manage to get Word Perfect or Lotus running and they're in heaven. The "Mac-ifying" of UN*X is occuring, as we have now with the NeXT box; turn-key system, pretty icons, easily installable applications. Software distribution might be easily done on CD-ROM and enough code thrown in. >So build a program that does everything, or perhaps 95%, of what a >good UNIX system administrator does. Or perhaps 99% of what a good >UNIX system administrator could do over the telephone. I have no doubt >that a good UNIX guru is more powerful than a good MS-DOS guru, simply >because the UNIX guru has more to work with. Embed that power in a >program, and there's your killer business app. You'll see more idiot-proofing of UN*X, easier installation of software, and probably some half-hearted attempts to put some AI into system management, kinda like AUTOGEN does for system tuning on VMS. Given the current tribal wars between OSF and System V, I doubt anyone is going to get around to releasing a "friendly" UNIX in the next 2-3 years. Doug Mohney, Operations Manager, CAD Lab/ME, Univ. of Maryland College Park * Ray Kaplan for DECUS president * SYSMGR@CADLAB.ENG.UMD.EDU