Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!world!iecc!compilers-sender
From: mazeikis@qucis.queensu.ca (Andy Mazeikis)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Subject: Intermediate Code Size for Phases of Compilation
Keywords: code, analysis, question
Message-ID: <1088@qusunb.queensu.CA>
Date: 12 Feb 91 15:22:52 GMT
Sender: compilers-sender@iecc.cambridge.ma.us
Reply-To: mazeikis@qucis.queensu.ca (Andy Mazeikis)
Organization: Queen's University, Kingston
Lines: 20
Approved: compilers@iecc.cambridge.ma.us

Given the standard phases of compilation:

	1)  Lexical Analysis
	2)  Parsing
	3)  Semantic Analysis
	4)  Code Generation

has there been any research done comparing the size of the intermediate
code produced by each phase, to the size of the input to that phase or 
to the size of the original program text.

Please email responses to:

	mazeikis@qucis.queensu.ca

Thanks,
Andrew J. Mazeikis
-- 
Send compilers articles to compilers@iecc.cambridge.ma.us or
{ima | spdcc | world}!iecc!compilers.  Meta-mail to compilers-request.