Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!eden.Berkeley.EDU!mao
From: mao@eden.Berkeley.EDU (Mike Olson)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: Database Comparisons
Message-ID: <10897@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 7 Feb 91 23:44:55 GMT
References: <10737@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <1991Feb7.134634.26917@infonode.ingr.com> <10876@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <1991Feb7.224441.17631@infonode.ingr.com>
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: mao@eden.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Mike Olson)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 10

as several people have pointed out, a higher data abstraction than the
storage manager uses is not exclusive to relational systems.  i mis-
stated my case.

thanks (more or less) for catching me out on this.

					mike olson
					postgres research group
					uc berkeley
					mao@postgres.berkeley.edu