Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!samsung!rex!ukma!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery
From: allbery@NCoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: how bad is oracle?
Message-ID: <1991Feb10.162535.4617@NCoast.ORG>
Date: 10 Feb 91 16:25:35 GMT
References: <10737@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <1991Feb3.182558.14411@oracle.com> <1991Feb6.181906.17145@cimage.com>
Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR)
Followup-To: comp.databases
Organization: North Coast Public Access Un*x (ncoast)
Lines: 16

As quoted from <1991Feb6.181906.17145@cimage.com> by dbc@cimage.com (David Caswell):
+---------------
| How bad is Oracle -- Not nearly as bad as Unify.
+---------------

Which Unify?  Unify 2000 doesn't seem to have any problems with queries being
phrased in the "wrong" order or etc., and (once we figured out where we needed
indexes on some large tables) runs quite fast.  Certainly faster than the old
Unify 4.0/5.0.

++Brandon
-- 
Me: Brandon S. Allbery			    VHF/UHF: KB8JRR on 220, 2m, 440
Internet: allbery@NCoast.ORG		    Packet: KB8JRR @ WA8BXN
America OnLine: KB8JRR			    AMPR: KB8JRR.AmPR.ORG [44.70.4.88]
uunet!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery    Delphi: ALLBERY