Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!uunet!mcsun!cernvax!cernvax.cern.ch
From: burow@cernvax.cern.ch (burkhard burow)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: cond. op. on ='s LHS
Message-ID: <4155@cernvax.cern.ch>
Date: 13 Feb 91 16:48:08 GMT
Sender: burow@cernvax.cern.ch
Organization: CERN, European Laboratory for Particle Physics
Lines: 10

I'm wondering if anyone has any comments on using:

       *(a==b?&c:&d) = 1;

instead of:

       if (a==b) c=1;
       else      d=1;

thanks, burkhard  burow%13313.hepnet@csa3.lbl.gov