Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: ANS TC Magnet for Vocabularies and :
Message-ID: <2320.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 10 Feb 91 21:49:49 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 28


 Date: 02-07-91 (20:40)              Number: 1067 of 1069
   To: JACK WOEHR                    Refer#: 1031
 From: CRAIG TRELEAVEN                 Read: NO
 Subj: ALSO/ONLY                     Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
 Conf: FORTH (58)                 Read Type: GENERAL (+)

 -> Only if everyone implements *ALL* the extension word sets.  In our
 -> own case, I can definitely promise you that LMI will *NOT* implement
 -> the extension words that it considers brain-damaged, which definitely
 -> includes ALSO and ONLY.

 Um this is actually directed to Ray Duncan, the orignal poster...

    What's so wrong with ALSO/ONLY?  I always found it a useful way to
 organize a large system.  A Forth vocabulary with 1,500+ words is not my
 idea of easy to use.  I miss ALSO/ONLY on MacForth, now.

 Craig Treleaven

 PCRelay:CRS -> RelayNet (tm)
 4.10a14        Canada Remote Systems * Toronto, Ontario
 <<<>>>
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You cannot Reply to the author
using email.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, whatever).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us or uunet!willett!dwp