Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: ANS TC Magnet for Vocabularies and :
Message-ID: <2334.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 13 Feb 91 02:53:50 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 22


 Date: 02-08-91 (09:19)              Number: 1083 of 1110 (Echo)
   To: CRAIG TRELEAVEN               Refer#: 1067
 From: RAY DUNCAN                      Read: NO
 Subj: ALSO/ONLY                     Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
 Conf: FORTH (58)                 Read Type: GENERAL (+)

    Craig Treleaven writes:

    >Whats wrong with ALSO/ONLY.  ...  A Forth vocabulary with 1500+
    >words is not my idea of easy to use.

 It's not my idea of easy to use either.  I have nothing against
 vocabularies, just the brain-damaged ALSO/ONLY scheme.

 NET/Mail : LMI Forth Board, Los Angeles, CA (213) 306-3530
 <<<>>>
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You cannot Reply to the author
using email.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, whatever).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us or uunet!willett!dwp