Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: ANS TC Magnet for Vocabularies and :
Message-ID: <2335.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 13 Feb 91 02:53:52 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 26


 Date: 02-10-91 (17:41)              Number: 1111 of 1116
   To: RAY DUNCAN                    Refer#: 1083
 From: CRAIG TRELEAVEN                 Read: NO
 Subj: ALSO/ONLY                     Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
 Conf: FORTH (58)                 Read Type: GENERAL (+)

 Ray Duncan writes:
 -> [...]  I have nothing against
 -> vocabularies, just the brain-damaged ALSO/ONLY scheme.

   Sorry, I still don't understand what is wrong with ALSO/ONLY?  It
 seemed to me to be a nice way to control the search order.  Words could
 be grouped into as many vocabularies as necessary and the search order
 set to only search the relevant ones.

 Craig

 PCRelay:CRS -> RelayNet (tm)
 4.10a14        Canada Remote Systems * Toronto, Ontario
 <<<>>>
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You cannot Reply to the author
using email.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, whatever).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us or uunet!willett!dwp