Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!crackers!m2c!umvlsi!dime!lastresort.cs.umass.edu!pop
From: pop@lastresort.cs.umass.edu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Continuations (continued)
Message-ID: <26544@dime.cs.umass.edu>
Date: 13 Feb 91 14:34:46 GMT
Sender: news@dime.cs.umass.edu
Reply-To: pop@lastresort.cs.umass.edu ()
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Lines: 28

From dime!lastresort.cs.umass.edu!pop Wed Feb 13 09:30:46 EST 1991
Article 2989 of comp.lang.lisp:
Path: dime!lastresort.cs.umass.edu!pop
>From: pop@lastresort.cs.umass.edu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Continuations
Keywords: Continuations
Message-ID: <26525@dime.cs.umass.edu>
Date: 13 Feb 91 02:06:42 GMT
Sender: news@dime.cs.umass.edu
Reply-To: pop@cs.umass.edu ()
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Lines: 7
Expires:
References:
Followup-To:

The last message I submitted lost some text, unfortunately. Approximately
it should have read:

In treating continuations in Common Lisp it is necessary to treat special
variables appropriately. This caused us grief in 1971 before the Scheme-led
move to lexicals, when all variables were in effect special. It made the
creation of continuations expensive. I would be interested to discover how
current Lisp implemenations would treat this issue.

I think in fact that the capability is actually available to the (mostly
European) users of Poplog Common Lisp, via. the call pop11::consprocto