Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!mucs!liv-cs!liv!qq11
From: QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK (Alan Thew)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh
Subject: Is mh easy to build and use?
Message-ID: <91043.150857QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK>
Date: 12 Feb 91 15:08:57 GMT
Organization: University of Liverpool
Lines: 14

I am looking at Un*x mail user agents including mh. I have looked at mush
and elm and I have to admit that mh compared to the other 2 is BIG,
difficult to build (for a un*x novice) and hard to use (ver 6.7).

Since mh is widely used, I want to give it proper consideration, so try
some 'hard sell' on me. Please do *NOT* urge me to use mh-e though. GNU-Emacs
is not on the test machine and is unlikely to be (besides the other MUAs
don't need an editor to make them usable :-)).

Alan Thew  : University of Liverpool Computer Laboratory
Bitnet/Earn: QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK or QQ11%UK.AC.LIVERPOOL @ UKACRL
    UUCP   :           ....!mcsun!ukc!liv!qq11
   Voice   :  +44 51 794 3735        FAX : +44 51 794 3759
Internet   : QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK or QQ11%LIVERPOOL.AC.UK @ NSFNET-RELAY.AC.UK