Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!sei!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!dd26+ From: dd26+@andrew.cmu.edu (Douglas F. DeJulio) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: Registered SMTP Message-ID: Date: 16 Feb 91 03:19:34 GMT References: <9102141624.AA01275@telesys.ncsc.navy.mil> Organization: Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA Lines: 14 In-Reply-To: <9102141624.AA01275@telesys.ncsc.navy.mil> mark@TELESYS.NCSC.NAVY.MIL (Mark L. Williams) writes: > In thinking about the issue some more, and reviewing people's worries > about excess flurries of acknowledgements being generated by mailers > along the line, it has occurred to me that the return message should > not be part of SMTP but rather be part of the user's mail interface. Two mail interfaces that currently provide this feature are the Andrew Message System and NeXT Mail. Both provide multimedia mail as well. AMS is somewhat better IMHO (and I think it's free), but you need the Andrew Tool Kit to get the multimedia features. -- Doug DeJulio ddj@zardoz.club.cc.cmu.edu (NeXT) dd26+@andrew.cmu.edu (AMS/ATK)