Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!abvax!iccgcc!kambic
From: kambic@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com
Newsgroups: comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: Do you have documentation standards?
Message-ID: <3218.27b7a7ab@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com>
Date: 12 Feb 91 13:30:35 GMT
References: <1194@kimbal.lynn.ma.us>
Lines: 25

In article <1194@kimbal.lynn.ma.us>, rick@kimbal.lynn.ma.us (Rick Kimball) writes:
> To move to the next level of software engineering maturity we need to
> put in place a more formal process definition.  What I'm really
> looking for is a cookbook that outlines what should be expected from
> each step of the process and a definition of what each process is.
> I'm looking to see what other companies are using?  Do you have a
> skeleton document for each process?  To what extent have you 
> automated the process?
> 
I am not able to offer any references to internal process issues at all.
However, I would recommend that you start with the IEEE standard for 
a software process model.  If you are not a member of the IEEE, you probably
ought to join, and get a copy of the SW standards.  

> 
> Any references to books or FTP'able documents would be appreciated.
> 
> Please mail all responses to me and I will summarize them.
> 
> Rick Kimball  |  INTERNET: rick@kimbal.lynn.ma.us
>               |      UUCP: ...!spdcc!kimbal!rick, ...!spt!kimbal!rick
>               |      POTS: (617) 599-8864

GXKambic
standard disclaimer