Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!nikhefh!x51 From: x51@nikhefh.nikhef.nl (Excursiecommissie) Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn Subject: Re: Suggestions Message-ID: <1152@nikhefh.nikhef.nl> Date: 13 Feb 91 14:44:31 GMT References: <8454@castle.ed.ac.uk> Sender: x51@nikhef.nl (Excursiecommissie) Reply-To: x51@nikhefh.nikhef.nl (Excursiecommissie) Organization: Nikhef-H, Amsterdam (the Netherlands). Lines: 51 In article <8454@castle.ed.ac.uk> ecwu61@castle.ed.ac.uk (R Renwick) writes: > >In article <1991Feb11.124128.2990@cns.umist.ac.uk> vanaards%t7@uk.ac.man.cs writes: >> Presently there is NO way of undeleting a file - this is a MAJOR mistake. >> If you're in business & you accidently delete your current work file >> you've no way of recovering it other that hacking the disk. But with >> DOS based systems there's no hassle, I've seem many undelete programs. > > Well I ain't ever used an OS that has a built in 'undelete' >facility. I have seen programs such as undel for MS-DROS and Unix boxes >and Recover for the Archi though. Have you ever used Quick Unerase from the Norton Utilities on a PC or the Macintosh? This is the way Recover for the Arch should work. No hassle, just simply recovering your file from a list of recoverable files. I sure would like a utility that did that. Sadly I haven't got time (and ideas) to implement a thing like that, so I hope there is some clever programmer out there who will write this for us. :-) >> Group selection of icons within a window would be useful. If you're familiar >> with the Atari machines you'll know what I mean. Being able to have a rubber >> banded selection area would make things a lot simpler when operating upon >> a lot of files. > > Yuch!!!!!!! Windows 3 on the PC allows you to do this and it >make the overall appearence of the desktop look terrible. I like to see >the files in nice neat lines and in alphabetical order so I know where >in a window to look for a particular file. I think you are discussing two different things here, and are forgetting on which computer it all originated (The Mac) (Ok, the Xerox Star). I think rubberbanding is a very good idea. On my mac I always group the files together that belong together, so I can select them all together. I hate it on my Arc that if I want 17 files from a directory with 40 entries, I have to click 17 times on different files. I want to do it in one, or a couple of, strokes. About the second thing: I like to group the files like I want to. I want the wimp to open a directory with only the files visible I find interesting. Also I want the wimp to open the directory where I last closed it, so you can make a nice layout of your desktop. > Have you ever used a PC for DTP? If you had, I'm sure you would >understand why PC people get excited when they see what the Archi can do. Have you ever used a Mac for DTP? I like Impression a lot, but I still use a Macintosh WORD-PROCESSOR for most of my DTP work. Axel. (I have an Arc for programming, and a Mac for serious work because it works).