Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!news.funet.fi!hydra!cc.helsinki.fi!jalkio
From: jalkio@cc.helsinki.fi
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: A3000UX - Born to run UNIX SVR4
Message-ID: <1991Feb8.134256.4811@cc.helsinki.fi>
Date: 8 Feb 91 13:42:56 GMT
References: <581.27a97594@vger.nsu.edu> <8298@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> <hunter.665900413@thomas>
Organization: University of Helsinki
Lines: 16

In article <hunter.665900413@thomas>, hunter@bacchus.esa.oz.au (James Gardiner [hunter]) writes:


>  
> 
> Finaly which performes better.  030 3000UX or 030 NeXT?

There is no point in comparing these two machines since 030 NeXT's are
out of production and the new NeXTs (040) are much cheaper than the old
ones. 

Comparing Amiga 3000UX to old 030 NeXTs for "advertising" purposes is
simply misleading.


				Jouni Alkio