Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!gatech!psuvax1!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!lobster!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: Why all of this NeXT talk? Keywords: A3000UX NeXT stop rediculous Message-ID: <1991Feb13.204600.3720@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 13 Feb 91 20:46:00 GMT References: <1991Feb11.214121.210@en.ecn.purdue.edu> <1991Feb13.011915.21730@sugar.hackercorp.com> <1991Feb13.051539.11902@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> Distribution: usa Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX Lines: 16 In article <1991Feb13.051539.11902@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> rjc@geech.ai.mit.edu (Ray Cromwell) writes: > >Higher resolution display, more colors (both in palette and in range), better > >UNIX/display integration, real live applications that run under UNIX instead > >of a single-tasking O/S, more RAM on the motherboard, two serial ports, ether, > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Since when has the Amiga, or any other workstation been single-tasking? Open mouth, insert foot. I meant "single-user". Mea cupa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. Apologies to all. In any case, the existing applications that run on Amiga UNIX can be counted on the fingers of one foot (the one in my mouth?). It's tough enough finding them for 386 UNIX. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .