Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: A3000UX - Born to run UNIX SVR4 Message-ID: <1991Feb14.171425.6800@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 14 Feb 91 17:14:25 GMT References: <1991Feb13.231511.5001@sugar.hackercorp.com> <9552@uwm.edu> Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX Lines: 26 In article <9552@uwm.edu> gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu writes: > Whew... I thought that maybe there was a man on earth who would actually > BELIEVE all of that stuff... I didn't think anyone's mind could be that > polluted with JobItis... :) Hey, the NeXT is still a great evangelical machine for UNIX. I still wish HP had kept the Integral up to date, and AT&T hadn't dropped the 3B1 machines... On running AmigaOS under UNIX: > You mean like how A/UX runs Finder/MacOS programs under it? Or how VPix runs MS-DOS programs (including Windows). I think it'd be easier in some ways, harder in others. Amiga programs tend not to play silly-buggers with pointers or depend on busy-waiting, but they do demand more in the way of response from the O/S. > I don't understand how you would implement it w/o putting it into > the Unix Kernel... And that might be a no-no if AT&T didn't approve.... Run AmigaOS as a process. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .