Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!samsung!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!en.ecn.purdue.edu!huebner
From: huebner@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Robert E. Huebner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
Subject: Re: Best Monitor For Graphical Applications.
Keywords: monitor, graphics, flickerfixer.
Message-ID: <1991Feb14.004840.1616@en.ecn.purdue.edu>
Date: 14 Feb 91 00:48:40 GMT
References: <1991Feb6.100224.12865@cbnewse.att.com> <26742@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> <1991Feb13.000003.21204@comspec.uucp>
Organization: Commission for the safe & ethical use of mints and lozenges
Lines: 29

In article <1991Feb13.000003.21204@comspec.uucp> darrell@comspec.uucp (Darrell Grainger) writes:
>In article <26742@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>, jma@beach.cis.ufl.edu (John 'Vlad' Adams) writes:
>> For the interlace board, I'd go with the Commodore board
>> without any doubt.  Cheaper and better than the Microway.
>> 
>> For the monitor, I'd go with either the Princeton UltraSync
>> or the NEC 3D.
>> --
>
> With a lot of the new resolution of AmigaDOS 2.0 I would say that the Nec 3D
>is not the best choice. I did not get the model number but saw someone with a
>really nice Zenith monitor. It had the nice feature of no border and autosized
>to the changing resolutions.

Also, in a past post regarding technical specifications for the
A2410 (ULowell) card, it was stated that a Nec4D-type monitor would
be needed to access all the display resolutions available from the
TIGA board.

Particularly I think it was stated that the 1024x1024x8 mode required
a sync rate the 3D is incapable of.

Something to think aobut if you plan to upgrade to Amiga UNIX (and have
far too much disposable income)

-- 
| Robert E. Huebner                   | "Death is nature's way of telling  |
| huebner@en.ecn.purdue.edu           |  you to slow down"                 |
| huebner@aerospace.aero.org          |   - Unknown Author                 |