Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!helios!bcm!dimacs.rutgers.edu!seismo!ukma!rex!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!faatcrl!jimb From: jimb@faatcrl.UUCP (Jim Burwell) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.audio Subject: Re: SMUS vs MED songs Message-ID: <993@faatcrl.UUCP> Date: 15 Feb 91 04:51:13 GMT References: <21086@know.pws.bull.com> Organization: FAA Technical Center, Atlantic City NJ Lines: 44 C503719@UMCVMB.MISSOURI.EDU (Baird McIntosh) writes: [...] >demos that came with it. While AmigaVision was neat, the SMUS score that >accompanied the demo was awful. I used to think SMUS scores sounded neat too. Until I head ST/NT :-). [...] >I know there are exceptions, but you can get much smoother results and much >more interesting songs with MED or one of the 'Tracker programs. Part of that is due to the effects and things you can do dynamically with *tracker programs (slides, appregios, etc), and the simplicity of the scoreing system (simplicity of implementation, not use :-). >I propose that Commodore adopt a native Amiga music format similar to or >equivalent to the MED song format. Call it SuperSMUS... whatever. >This probably belongs in .advocacy, but don't worry: I'm not going to >keep ranting about it. I just think that you can do a lot more with MED. >If only MED had a traditional musician's interface, we'd win many more over. Med's formats were a step in the right direction. Perhaps the author will come out with an IFF'ized module format. C'ya, Jim -- +--------------------------+ _ |INET: jimb@faatcrl.uucp | | \ |UUCP: ..!rutgers!faatcrl!| _| \______________________________________ | jimb | - ______ ________________ \_`, +------------------------- + -(_______ -= -= USAF ) `--------=============----------------` - - - - ` . . - - .*` .* ;`*,`., `, ,`.*.*. * ______________________________________* * ` ^ *____________________________ IRAQ