Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!pacbell.com!ucsd!nosc!crash!pnet01!uzun
From: uzun@pnet01.cts.com (Roger Uzun)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.games
Subject: Re: DragonStrike Info Needed (esp. A3000 vs PC comparison)
Message-ID: <7520@crash.cts.com>
Date: 12 Feb 91 00:36:01 GMT
Sender: root@crash.cts.com
Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon CA
Lines: 19


I have played through DragonStrike all 3 ways on the Amiga 3000, and
I have played it for a few hours on a 386 PC.  The A3000 version
is somewhat faster, the VGA version has somewhat better graphics.
Gameplay is about the same, sound on the Amiga version is better,
at least as good as the SoundBlaster soundtrack, I thought Amiga
sounded better.

They are very comparable, but the VGA graphics are a little nicer,
I do not know why, it is not the palette that makes them better,
but rather the dragon bitmaps themselves are a bit nicer on the
VGA version.  Maybe that is why the A3000 version performs somewhat
better than the PC version (even on a 33 Mhz 386)

-Roger

UUCP: {hplabs!hp-sdd ucsd nosc}!crash!pnet01!uzun
ARPA: crash!pnet01!uzun@nosc.mil
INET: uzun@pnet01.cts.com