Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!psuvm!blekul11!gutest8
From: GUTEST8@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be (Ives Aerts)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Re: Imploder vs. PowerPacker
Message-ID: <91042.115408GUTEST8@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be>
Date: 11 Feb 91 11:53:08 GMT
References: <1477@pdxgate.UUCP> <1991Feb7.172728.16199@ucselx.sdsu.edu>
 <1991Feb7.152324@monet.ucdavis.edu>
Organization: K.U.Leuven - Academic Computing Center
Lines: 24

In article <1991Feb7.152324@monet.ucdavis.edu>, you say:
>
>Definitely use Imploder instead of PowerPacker.
>Imploder compresses faster
>Imploder decompresses TWICE AS FAST
>Imploder consistently makes smaller compressed files
>Imploder is way cool!
>
>There is supposed to be an even more cool Version 4.0 of Imploder coming out
>soon.
>
>-bruce

Could you mention which version of PowerPacker you're comparing to ?
The 3.0b version that I have is zillions of times faster than the PD
2.3b version. Keep an eye on comp.sys.amiga.announce to get a feature
list of the latest version (I just love the 2.0 look PP has on my 1.3
Amiga)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Ives Aerts           |          IBM definition SY-34378
GUTEST8@BLEKUL11.BITNET    |   A signature consists of sequences of
gutest8@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be | non-blank characters separated by blanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------