Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!ogicse!pdxgate!eecs!algoa From: algoa@eecs.cs.pdx.edu (Gregory Bowers) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc Subject: Re: FACTS ABOUT WB2.0 (Was: Re:WB2.0 for non-A3000) Message-ID: <1484@pdxgate.UUCP> Date: 7 Feb 91 22:31:06 GMT References: <5542@baird.cs.strath.ac.uk> Sender: news@pdxgate.UUCP Lines: 28 bsyme@cs.strath.ac.uk (Brian J Syme IE88) writes: >In article robin@niksula.hut.fi (Jarto 'Robin' Tarpio) writes: >> As long as developers keep sending bug-reports, the WB2.0 >> will be delayed. When it will be released, it will be >> extremely bug-free. Why can't anybody appreciate it ??? > BECAUSE ITS BEEN FOREVER AND A DAY IN COMING SO FAR > AND SHOWS NO SIGNS OF APPEARING WHATSOEVER! HOW BUG > RIDDEN IS IT!!! >-- ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> ><> Brian Syme <> Why make things difficult, when with just a <> ><> bsyme@cs.strath.ac.uk <> little more effort you could make them <> ><> <> impossible. <> ><><><><><> *WARNING* Signature dying of old age... ><><><><><><><><><><><><><> As far as I know the developers must report bugs NOW or they'll be stuck with them. I guess this means KS 2.0 ROM can't be too far off. Anyway I for one would rather wait for bug free ROMs, than get something that we'll all bitch and moan about until KS 2.1 or 3.0. Amiga is die beste! 'n IBM is 'n rekenaar? Die Mac is net 'n vrot appel! algoa@eecs.cs.pdx.edu Portland TrailBlazers now 39-9 and KICKING ASS!