Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!uflorida!mlb.semi.harris.com!olympus!theborg!rshaw
From: rshaw@theborg.mlb.fl.us (Ron)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Re: Imploder vs. PowerPacker
Message-ID: <rshaw.0533@theborg.mlb.fl.us>
Date: 12 Feb 91 12:40:50 GMT
References: <1477@pdxgate.UUCP> <1991Feb7.172728.16199@ucselx.sdsu.edu>
            <91042.115408GUTEST8@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be>
Organization: Brevard MainFrame BBS, Palm Bay Florida (407) 952-6969
Lines: 12

I too have tried the latest verions of power packer vs the latest version of
Imploder. If I do get power packed files, I immediately un-power pack them and
implode them. on my 2000/GVP 030 imploder seems to do a little better job
imploding the files (not much but in some instances as much as 5K) and they
sure load a hell of a lot faster. I use power packer for crunching text only.
WIth imploder you can combine hunks without crunching the file. thats another
nice feature

Ron Shaw.....                 The only good 8 bit computer is a
                              Dead 8 bit compter....
-----------------------------Mathematics is a state of mind,
Electronics is a state of being.