Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!spool.mu.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!psuvm!blekul11!gutest8 From: GUTEST8@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be (Ives Aerts) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer Subject: Re: How are some programs SO DAMN SMALL! Message-ID: <91045.150604GUTEST8@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be> Date: 14 Feb 91 15:05:04 GMT References: <1991Jan20.210328.18087@hoss.unl.edu> <28077.279c3c3f@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> <91042.125712UH2@psuvm.psu.edu> <91042.134209J56QC@CUNYVM.BITNET> Organization: K.U.Leuven - Academic Computing Center Lines: 25 In article , mwm@pa.dec.com (Mike (My Watch Has Windows) Meyer) says: > >In article <91042.134209J56QC@CUNYVM.BITNET> J56QC@CUNYVM.BITNET writes: > To write small programs YOU write THEM in ASSEMBLER :) > >No, _you_ write them in assembler. _I_ write them in the best language >for the job. You're right here... > >Example: I just spent 30 seconds turning out a "hello world" program >in a language chosen to 1) be portable, and 2) generate small >executables. The executable is 20 bytes long. How small is your best But this is VERY hard to believe.. 'hello world' is 11 bytes, how on earth are you gonna make an executable that's only 9 bytes longer ?????? >