Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!emory!utkcs2!usenet From: wnn@ornl.gov Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware Subject: Re: Leaving Mac On Message-ID: <1991Feb11.192154.19250@cs.utk.edu> Date: 11 Feb 91 19:21:54 GMT References: <6140@idunno.Princeton.EDU> Sender: usenet@cs.utk.edu (USENET News Poster) Organization: University of Tennessee/Oak Ridge National Labora Lines: 57 In article <6140@idunno.Princeton.EDU> rlwald@phoenix.princeton.edu (Rob Wald) writes: > > What is the current wisdom on leaving your computer on? The stress of thermal cycling may reduce component life if you keep turning your computer off and on every hour. On the other hand, most components are reated for mean time between failure (MTBF) not taking into account how many power-on cycles you go through. If you turn your computer off and on less than four or five times per day, total up time probably has a greater influence on the life span of most of the components. Many electronic components, such as CRTs or capacitors decay over time and mechanical parts, such as disk drive bearings wear out. At the minimum, turn your computer off over night. A week has 168 hours, most people work only 40 to 50 hours. So you can expect your hardware to last about three times longer, even figuring in a rather generous discount for thermal stress aging. And, of course, you help conserve a lot of energy that way, which will not only save you or your employer money, but will also help reduce environmental impacts! Moreover, while your computer is turned off, it is much less likely to be damaged by a power spike. In terms of power consumption, it is even more important that you turn laser printers off when not in use. They generally consume much more energy than a personal computer because they keep their fuser rollers hot all the time. Actually, some of the older models of the HP LaserJet can even suffer damage when left turned on for several day without use. The constant pressure and warmth one one side of the rubber rollers causes them to be deformed. The myth that it is better for computers to be left powered on may stem in part from a mistaken comparison with mainframes, most of which do batch processing during the night anyway. Modern desktop computers are designed for frequent power cycling and they use components that are quite different from those in their elder brothers and sisters. Some mainframe CPU's are cooled to cryogenic temperatures and can only stand a few dozen or hundred cycles of warming up to room temperature and being brought down to operating conditions again. The entire debate reminds me a little bit of the one about fluorescent lighting. In that case an old myth holds that restarting fluorescent lamps takes more energy than leaving them on for several hours. Just think how much power that would be in the couple of seconds for starting them up and what heavy wiring it would require to supply that power. Our wall switches and power distribution boxes would resemble a power company switchyard! Wolfgang N. Naegeli President, MacClique--East Tennessee Macintosh Users Group University of Tennessee & Oak Ridge National Laboratory Internet: wnn@ornl.gov Bitnet: wnn@ornlstc Phone: 615-574-6143 Fax: 615-574-6141 (MacFax) QuickMail (QM-QM): Wolfgang Naegeli @ 615-574-4510