Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
From: awessels@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Allen Wessels)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: oh ghod NeXT time.....
Message-ID: <44022@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: 11 Feb 91 20:37:34 GMT
References: <12374.27b40897@ecs.umass.edu> <$e8Ggofj@cs.psu.edu>
Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp
Reply-To: awessels@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Allen Wessels)
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 13

In article <$e8Ggofj@cs.psu.edu> melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes:
>Ya know, I don't see anything wrong with a little comparison and
>contrast every know and then in a *.misc group.  The only problem is
>that you get people who jump in and say stuff like "Yeah, but my
>$100,000 mainframe is faster than your $5000 computer."

Well, gee, how sensitive.  I read a LOT of groups, and if I wanted information
about the NeXT, I'd read that group.  What is the point of separate groups if 
some people think that what they have to say transcends group boundaries?

You may actually be doing somebody a favor by posting this informatio here, BUT
I guarantee you are also alienating people who might otherwise be recommending
NeXT machines.