Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!think.com!hsdndev!husc6!endor!siegel
From: siegel@endor.uucp (Rich Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: No THINK C++? (was Re: ANSI vs. THINK. Help!)
Keywords: C++ THINK-C
Message-ID: <5709@husc6.harvard.edu>
Date: 13 Feb 91 01:53:01 GMT
References: <SWYNNE.91Feb9230636@decoy.uoregon.edu> <2434@key.COM> <1991Feb12.132525.24968@cbnews.att.com>
Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu
Reply-To: siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel)
Organization: Symantec Language Products Group
Lines: 16

In article <1991Feb12.132525.24968@cbnews.att.com> jbr@cblph.att.com writes:
>In article <2434@key.COM> perry@arkon.key.COM (Perry The Cynic) writes:
>> Don't think for a moment that THINK C (V 4.x) is C++; it isn't, and I have
>> it on good authority (people from Symantec) that its creators despise the
>> C++ language and don't intend to implement it until the market (us) force
>> them to. [...]

	It is company policy to not comment on unannounced products or
revisions, so I doubt that anyone I know would have said such a thing in
any public official capacity.

R.

 Rich Siegel	Symantec Languages Group  Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu

"I was just trying to be subtle. That's my job, isn't it?"