Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!src.honeywell.com!msi.umn.edu!cs.umn.edu!kksys!edgar!mmug!p510.f22.n282.z1.mmug.edgar.mn.org!Jim.Spencer
From: Jim.Spencer@p510.f22.n282.z1.mmug.edgar.mn.org (Jim Spencer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: MacApp
Message-ID: <4.27B9B834@mmug.edgar.mn.org>
Date: 12 Feb 91 23:49:13 GMT
Sender: ufgate@mmug.edgar.mn.org (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:282/22.510 - SmorgasBoard, Twin Cities, MN USA
Lines: 15


Pete Hoch writes in a message to All

PH> You are absolutly right. Useing the word support was a bad choice 
PH> of words on my part. What I ment to say in a round about way 
PH> was that if MacApp 3.0 source is only released in C++, the people 
PH> who use THINK Pascal will have a hard time changing the MacApp 
PH> source and recompiling it if they need to.

It occurs to me that the Think Pascal user will have a bigger problem than that, i.e. the fact that the MPW C++ produced object libraries probably won't be compatable with Think Pascal meaning that TP users will be SOL.
 
--  
Jim Spencer - via The Minnesota Macintosh Users Group UUCP-Fido Gateway
UUCP: ...uunet!tcnet!kksys!edgar!mmug!22.510!Jim.Spencer
INET: Jim.Spencer@p510.f22.n282.z1.mmug.edgar.mn.org