Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!helios!bcm!dimacs.rutgers.edu!seismo!uunet!lighthouse!spiff!ka3ovk!raysnec!shwake From: shwake@raysnec.UUCP (Ray Shwake) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: Call for vote: SPLIT GROUP! Message-ID: <244@raysnec.UUCP> Date: 14 Feb 91 13:05:16 GMT References: <1991Feb13.054713.247@macc.wisc.edu> Organization: IRS/CI - Technical Solutions Branch Lines: 18 anderson@dogie.macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes: >Just one: too many and *way* too soon. Your 'n' key >will work just fine for the things that don't interest >you. Agree, but let me extend this suggestion. Run 'nn' :-) The "Let's create a few more groups, because this group discusses matters I'm not interested in" philosophy discourages the creativity that comes from diversity of perspectives. Until this group's submissions exceed, say, 100 per day, or I'm flagging less than 30% of those submissions, I personally will oppose a breakup. BTW, since there has yet to be a Call for Discussion, a Call for Vote is not appropriate. Reference the Usenet guidelines. ----------- uunet!media!ka3ovk!raysnec!shwake shwake@rsxtech