Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!unmvax!uokmax!slfields From: slfields@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu (Scott L Fields) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: Death of OS/2? (was Re: Microsoft OS/2?) Message-ID: <1991Feb15.185534.9971@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu> Date: 15 Feb 91 18:55:34 GMT References: <70471@microsoft.UUCP> <2775@autodesk.COM> Organization: Engineering Computer Network, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK Lines: 18 In article <2775@autodesk.COM> glang@Autodesk.COM (Gary Lang) writes: > >Scott Hess says: > >>Xenix is not Unix. > >Yes it most certainly is. Err, well, a few people could debate this by defining "What is UNIX" Eventually you have to say is BSD, XENIX, SYS V , or any other variant truly UNIX? It has to fall to standards, and so far the only standard I see people compare everything to is AT+T. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scott Fields slfields@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu University of Oklahoma --------------------------------------------------------------------------------