Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!panews.awdpa.ibm.com!ibmpa.awdpa.ibm.com!lang From: lang@panews Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: Call for vote: SPLIT GROUP! Message-ID: <1991Feb16.004307.3971@ibmpa.awdpa.ibm.com> Date: 16 Feb 91 00:43:07 GMT References: Sender: news@ibmpa.awdpa.ibm.com (news id) Reply-To: lang@ibmpa.awdpa.ibm.com (Lang Zerner) Organization: IBM AWD Palo Alto Lines: 17 In article ls1i+@andrew.cmu.edu (Leonard John Schultz) writes: >I suggest: > >comp.sys.next.[...] > >Does any one else have any suggestions? Be smart and follow comp.sys.amiga's excellent idea: whatever the final split is (if any), be sure to include comp.sys.next.advocacy for discussions about what is so great about the NeXT, why it is better or worse than other platforms, etc. Those sorts of discussions have a legitimate purpose for those who haven't seen them all before, so it is important to have a place for them; but it is good to keep that place separate for those of us who have heard it all before and aren't interested anymore. Be seeing you... ++Lang