Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!metaware!ken
From: ken@metaware.metaware.com (ken)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: SECURITY BUG IN INTERACTIVE UNIX SYSV386
Keywords: BAD BUG
Message-ID: <1991Feb14.142947.1777@metaware.metaware.com>
Date: 14 Feb 91 14:29:47 GMT
References: <1991Feb11.184130.11321@jwt.UUCP> <1991Feb12.020625.6779@kithrup.COM> <11450@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu> <1991Feb13.230331.16512@kithrup.COM>
Reply-To: ken@metaware.UUCP (ken)
Organization: Metaware Incorporated, Santa Cruz, CA
Lines: 25

In article sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes:
-In article bekesy@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Bekesey Lab) writes:
----Now, the question is, what do we do to protect ourselves in the meantime?
---Get SCO.  [...]
--Please keep your mindless SCO chauvinism to yourself.
-
-Gee, that's funny.  When people complain all about SCO's problems, and other
-people respond with "Get ISC or ESIX," I don't see you complaining about
-that.


Sean,

I think you got flammed for posting a rather blatent advertisement for SCO.
Most people probably know that you work there and that you have rather biased
opinions about SCO's products.  That type of posting is generally frowned
upon.  



-- 
Ken "DOS by any other name will still be a kludge" Chapin

internet:	ken@metaware.com
uucp:		...!{ucscc|uunet}!metaware!ken