Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!uunet!pcserver2!kdenning From: kdenning@pcserver2.naitc.com (Karl Denninger) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: Equinox question Summary: If you need it, it's in there. Message-ID: <1991Feb14.224748.18446@pcserver2.naitc.com> Date: 14 Feb 91 22:47:48 GMT References: <27B79130.5C72@telly.on.ca> Organization: AC Nielsen, Bannockburn IL USA Lines: 43 In article <27B79130.5C72@telly.on.ca> evan@telly.on.ca (Evan Leibovitch) writes: >I've been looking at the Equinox Megaport boards and they look like a >decent deal. Then someone said that they won't do hardware flow control >and modem control on the same port at the same time. > >Is this true? It would strike me that having both functions is to get a >Telebit going at top speed. Or is it -- can a Telebit be run at full >speed on UUCP transfers using Xon-Xoff? I would think that this could be >a problem if the Xon is imbedded in a binary transfer... You >can< make an Equinox card do hardware flow control, but you have to live with a couple of strnage things :-) First, you have to wire a very strange cable. This is no big deal, but it is a difference from what you've done in the past (basically you steal control signals from the next port up). Secondly, the next port up the line from the one you have connected with full modem control has to run either data only or not be used. These are good ports to use for printers that only need 2,3 and 7 connected, however. If you need ALL FMC ports then you're limited to 24/2 or 12 ports on the 24 port cards..... Third, you do a "megamap +fmc do< need it. In any event it does work and is quite useful in the cases that you actually require it. -- Karl Denninger - AC Nielsen, Bannockburn IL (708) 317-3285 kdenning@nis.naitc.com "The most dangerous command on any computer is the carriage return." Disclaimer: The opinions here are solely mine and may or may not reflect those of the company.