Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!unmvax!ariel.unm.edu!sfreed
From: sfreed@ariel.unm.edu (Steven Freed CIRT)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: gcc vs. cc
Message-ID: <1991Feb13.231938.25877@ariel.unm.edu>
Date: 13 Feb 91 23:19:38 GMT
References: <16392@milton.u.washington.edu>
Reply-To: sfreed@ariel.unm.edu
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque NM
Lines: 13


In article <16392@milton.u.washington.edu>, mattf@cac.washington.edu (Matthew Freedman) writes:
> Does anybody have any opinions about whether or not it is worthwhile to
> use gcc instead of the standard Ultrix 4.0 cc compiler?  In particular 

I have found through my experiences that gcc is more reliable, more bug free 
than DEC's cc. gcc is also (as far as I have been able to tell) ANSII C
complient.

--

Thanks,
Steve.                    sfreed@ariel.unm.edu