Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu!csn!news!grunwald
From: grunwald@foobar.colorado.edu (Dirk Grunwald)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: gcc vs. cc
Message-ID: <1991Feb14.005708.577@csn.org>
Date: 14 Feb 91 00:57:08 GMT
References: <16392@milton.u.washington.edu> <1991Feb13.231938.25877@ariel.unm.edu>
Sender: news@csn.org (news)
Reply-To: grunwald@foobar.colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado at Boulder
Lines: 4
In-Reply-To: sfreed@ariel.unm.edu's message of 13 Feb 91 23:19:38 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: foobar.colorado.edu


I concurr; gcc is a little more reliable than the 4.0/4.1 mips CC. The
running application is 10%->20% slower, comparing highest levels of
optimization.