Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!sei!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!faraday.ECE.CMU.EDU!winstead
From: winstead@faraday.ECE.CMU.EDU (Charles Holden Winstead)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Question for WFW
Message-ID: <1991Feb15.082609.9730@fs7.ece.cmu.edu>
Date: 15 Feb 91 08:26:09 GMT
References: <1991Feb14.123809.11705@pbs.org>
Sender: news@fs7.ece.cmu.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon
Lines: 15

I write mainly scientific applications and currently use WP5.1 because
of the equation editor and its ability to incorporate graphics from
other sources, such as postscript, hppl, pcx, etc.  The only drawbacks
I see are that to run efficiently I have to leave the Windows environment
and the fact that it's not a what-you-see-is-what-you-get type of 
word processor.  My question is this - how is Word for Windows for doing
equations, how is it for importing graphics, and what is the word on
WP for windows - is it a WYSIWYG type of processor and are the features
the same as WP5.1?

Thanks.

Charles Winstead
winstead@faraday.ece.cmu.edu
Carnegie Mellon